UPDATE: Red Shoes Made for Walking but Not Trademarking? Christian Louboutin Files Reply Brief in Christian Louboutin/Yves Saint Laurent Red Mark Lawsuit
View the entire letter brief filed inChristian LouYve Saint Laurent keepboutin SA et al v. Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc et al., 1:11cv2381 (NYSD August 29, 2011)
Non-subscribers can purchase Trademark Lawtreatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications from theLexisNexis Bookstore
....
Update on the Red Shoes Controversy: Christian Louboutin v.Yves Saint Laurent
Red Shoes Take a Licking but Keep on Ticking: Christian Louboutin Argues against Including Yves Saint Laurents Exhibits in Record on Appeal,Scariest Moment in The Godther: Horse Head in the Bed Scene vs. Recent Copyright Lawsuit against Mario Puzos Estate
Last week, Louboutin filed a letter brief asking JudgeMarrero to redact certain exhibits offered by Saint-Laurent. Louboutinsletter comes after the parties iled to reach an agreement about whichportions of Saint-Laurents August 1
UPDATE: Zooey Deschanel Accuses Steve Madden Ltd. of Reneging on Shoe Deal; Khols DeRed Shoes Take a Licking but Keep on Ticking: Christian Louboutin Argues against Including Yves Saint Laurents Exhibits in Record on Appealpt Stores Loses Summary Judgment Fight
letter brief should be docketed andincluded in the record on appeal.
The Battle of Red Shoes: Christian Louboutin Sues Yves Saint-Laurent for Trademark Infringement of Distinctive Red Soles
Red Shoes Take a Licking but Keep on Ticking: Christian Louboutin Argues against Including Yves Saint Laurents Exhibits in Record on Appeal
Information related to this case:
Update: Letter Briefs Filed in the Red Shoes Controversy:Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent
In April, Christian Louboutin sued Yves Saint-Laurent fortrademark infringement, claiming that Saint-Laurents line of shoesinfringed Louboutins distinctive red soles. On August 10th, Judge Marrerodisposed of Louboutins motion for a preliminary injunction and, in doing so,set the stage for the cancellation of Louboutins red shoe mark.
Red Shoes Take a Licking but Keep on Ticking: Christian Louboutin Argues against Including Yves Saint Laurents Exhibits in Record on Appeal
Red Shoes Made for Walking but Not Trademarking? DecisionJeopardizes Louboutins Red Mark Lawsuit against Yves Saint Laurent
Tripping on the Red Carpet? Color Trademarks and the Fashion Industry in Loubotin v. Yves Saint Laurent
UPDATE:On August 30th, Saint-Laurentfiled a redacted version of its August 1st letter brief. The redacted version can be viewedhere. The original version can be viewedhere.
Select any content type from the list, once selected it will be automatically added to your My Page.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Fashion Complaint - Devi Kroell Inc & Azzurro Capital Inc vs. Gracelia Chiurazzi, 650400-2011 (N.Y. Gen. Term 2/15/11)
Judge Marreros denial notwithstanding, Louboutin marcheson.
Louboutin argues that several Saint-Laurentexhibits are not relevant to the issues on appeal. Of the challenged exhibits,the most significant is Exhibit 2, which pertains to Louboutins trademarkregistrations. Louboutins letter reads:
Lexis.com subscribers canexplore/search Trademark Law resourcesonLexis.com or access any of theseMathew BenderTrademark Law publications:
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through ourcorporate site.
